The reputation of the big social networks seems to sink every week. From Facebook to Twitter, from Snapchat to Instagram, concerns about everything from fake news to cyber-bullying are making many people wonder whether there is a better way to communicate online.

On this week’s Tech Tent, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales tells us why he thinks he has the answer. He has launched a new social network WT.Social, which is ad-free and promises high-quality content.

Invitation only

If you pay a fee you can join straightaway, if not you have to wait for a while and hope that an existing member invites you in. At the moment it looks like a very bare-bones web-based operation – there is no app – but already more than 300,000 people have expressed an interest in joining.

When he popped into the Tech Tent this week, I put it to him that there had been plenty of attempts at something similar which had come to nothing. He laughed and pointed out that on one such doomed network I appeared to be his only friend.

I wanted to know how he was going to get people hooked – but he said the whole mission was about rejecting the idea that a social network had to be addictive: “The social networks with a pure advertising business model have every incentive to put forward content that’s addictive, that keeps you clicking. Engagement is their main metric.”

That, he says, is why fake news and misinformation spreads through these networks.

Instead Jimmy Wales wants WT.Social to be packed with high-quality content and debate that people will value – and then feel inclined to support financially.

It sounds utopian but he points to the success of Wikipedia, the fifth most popular website which has neither ads nor clickbait headlines. “There’s no thought about optimising for addiction or time on site and yet it’s incredibly popular. And I think one of the reasons it is popular is that people say, ‘Yeah, I just I want to know something. So I go there and I learn something.'”

I am sure the likes of Facebook and Twitter started with similarly utopian visions but then found that trying to set boundaries for the online behaviour of millions of users was a herculean task, involving thousands of moderators and some very expensive technology.

Again, he points to Wikipedia where moderation is in the hands of the community. Unlike Facebook, where users report offensive content and the company eventually decides whether to remove it, volunteers will take down material they see as contravening the network’s rules.

He added: “You also have to be willing to ban people, to say, ‘Look, this is absolutely not welcome here’, which is hard to do if your business model is around engagement, because flame wars definitely keep people on site longer.”

It certainly sounds like an attractive proposition but much will depend on whether enough people pay to provide the funds to take the project forward. An app, which will be vital to making WT.Social a user-friendly experience, will come in the first half of next year if there is enough cash to hire developers.

The odds are against Jimmy Wales – WT.Social is an offshoot of WikiTribune, a platform which he hoped would transform journalism but struggled to make an impact.

Many people say they do not like the current social media model – the problem is convincing them to move to an unfamiliar place where they may fear there will be nobody they know.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


Source link

Load More By admin
Load More In Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Apple plans software fix for 16-inch MacBook Pro 'speaker popping' – Engadget

Sponsored Links Devindra Hardawar/Engadget No, you’re not crazy: you probably are he…